Skip to content
All statements
Altamont Advisory

Live · August 2026

Capability statement · Arm 02 · EdWorX

EdWorX

Education systems at national scale — quality, access, and ownership that lasts.

EdWorX is the education arm of Altamont Advisory. Ministries, UN education programmes, and foundations retain us when pilots are not enough — when national pathways, teacher systems, curriculum, and education MERL must hold under bandwidth, facilitator, and multi-partner constraints.

Institutional assignments
950+
People reached
100M+
Countries of delivery
150+
Specialists deployed
300+

For: Ministries of education and national education agencies · UN education and skills programmes · Foundations and education-focused INGOs · Corporate ESG, social impact, and L&D teams

Positioning

We design learning ecosystems with the people who must own them. Success is quality that remains when the project team leaves — not workshop volume or platform novelty. Same Implementation Integrity bar as Core Advisory and AI & Digital.

Core capabilities

Digital Learning & eLearning Ecosystems

Platforms, content, and learner pathways engineered for institutional and national contexts — including low-bandwidth and access-constrained settings.

  • Learning ecosystem architecture and LMS strategy
  • eLearning content design and quality frameworks
  • Digital skills programmes at national and institutional scale
  • Access, inclusion, and low-bandwidth delivery models

Education Systems Strengthening

Whole-system work so reform reaches classrooms and labour markets — policy, delivery, quality assurance, and institutional capability together.

  • Education sector diagnostics and reform support
  • Quality assurance and school improvement systems
  • Stakeholder coordination and delivery models
  • Institutional learning and knowledge systems

Curriculum & Competency Frameworks

Competency architectures and curricula aligned to national priorities, labour-market demand, and international standards.

  • Competency framework design and mapping
  • Curriculum review, development, and alignment
  • Assessment frameworks and standards
  • TVET, higher education, and professional pathways

Training & Professional Development

Teacher and workforce development designed for transfer of learning — cascade quality, coaching, and continuous improvement systems.

  • Teacher professional development design and delivery
  • Facilitator and ToT models with quality assurance
  • Leadership and instructional coaching programmes
  • Corporate L&D and impact-linked learning pathways

Education MERL

Evidence for education investment decisions: learning outcomes, programme effectiveness, system performance, and adaptive improvement.

  • Education programme evaluations and learning reviews
  • Learning outcome measurement and assessments
  • Education management information and indicator systems
  • Evidence synthesis for policy and practice

How we work — Implementation Integrity

  1. 01

    Listen for the decision

    We start where you are under pressure: what must be decided, funded, or defended. Only then do we reverse-engineer the evidence and constraints. If the decision is unclear, the method is premature — and we say so.

  2. 02

    Design for how you actually deliver

    Methods fit absorption capacity, political economy, and the operating environment. Global standards (including OECD-DAC where required) held together with local realism — especially in multi-country, multi-partner work.

  3. 03

    Leave the institution stronger

    Tools, standards, and learning loops stay with your teams. The test of Implementation Integrity: the system still works when we are no longer in the room.

Selected outcomes leadership can defend

Representative results. Named references available under NDA where approved.

  • National digital skills pathway for education system scale

    National pathway cabinet could defend: competencies, facilitator standards, ownership at scale.

  • System-wide teacher professional development model

    PD as an institutional cycle: standards, coaching, monitoring that remains after close-out.

  • Institutional learning architecture for multi-country education delivery

    Cross-country teams stopped reinventing — knowledge capture and utilisation-focused evidence loops shortened the path from insight to practice.

  • Competency framework and curriculum alignment for skills pathways

    Clear progression pathways and assessment standards ready for institutional adoption and labour-market alignment after programme close.