Under Altamont Advisory · Arm 02 · Education & learning
EdWorX Consulting Inc · Atlanta · Since 2002
Trainers and measurement tools for UN and INGO programmes. A team that can run the next cycle. Proposals are written by our sister firm, Altamont Advisory.
Workshops that evaporate. Toolkits nobody opens next quarter. A ToT that never becomes a team that can run the next cycle. Staying with that pattern usually costs more than changing it.
Education systems at national scale — quality, access, and ownership that lasts.
Institutional weight
Depth across multi-country portfolios — Africa, Southeast Asia, and complex delivery environments.
950+
Institutional assignments
100M+
People reached
150+
Countries of delivery
300+
Specialists deployed
Shortlist materials for procurement and evaluation committees.
Download capability statementsProcess
Name the learning problem. Design what people will actually do after the workshop. Run a training of trainers so the skill stays. Leave blank tools so the team can measure the next cycle. A person Accepts each gate before the pack moves.
01
Name the learning problem.
02
Design what people will actually do after the workshop.
03
Run a training of trainers so the skill stays.
04
Leave blank tools so the team can measure the next cycle.
05
A person Accepts each gate before the pack moves.
Single titles and retainers sit under the practice — invoice / RFQ; no cart on this page.
Capabilities
Platforms, content, and learner pathways engineered for institutional and national contexts — including low-bandwidth and access-constrained settings.
Whole-system work so reform reaches classrooms and labour markets — policy, delivery, quality assurance, and institutional capability together.
Competency architectures and curricula aligned to national priorities, labour-market demand, and international standards.
Teacher and workforce development designed for transfer of learning — cascade quality, coaching, and continuous improvement systems.
Evidence for education investment decisions: learning outcomes, programme effectiveness, system performance, and adaptive improvement.
Who we serve
Selected work
Southeast Asia · national scale
Outcome leadership defended
National pathway cabinet could defend: competencies, facilitator standards, ownership at scale.
Pressure
Successful digital skills pilot. Public deadline to scale nationally. Facilitator supply and access risked collapse.
Multi-country · Africa focus contexts
Outcome leadership defended
PD as an institutional cycle: standards, coaching, monitoring that remains after close-out.
Pressure
PD that changed classroom practice and survived turnover — not another calendar of events.
Global multi-country
Outcome leadership defended
Cross-country teams stopped reinventing — knowledge capture and utilisation-focused evidence loops shortened the path from insight to practice.
Pressure
A multi-country education partner was reinventing approaches in each geography with no shared evidence loop under partner fragmentation.
National · labour-market aligned
Outcome leadership defended
Clear progression pathways and assessment standards ready for institutional adoption and labour-market alignment after programme close.
Pressure
Authorities needed progression and assessment standards that employers and institutions would both recognise and sustain.
One practice
Next step
National skills, teacher systems, digital learning, curriculum, or education MERL. Response within two business days.
